Legal Opinion
Old Fashion Farms v. Hamrick
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 4, 1967No. Civ. 30960PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoth, P. J.
On April 27, 1964, appellant Old Fashion Farms, a California corporation, sued Essie Hamrick for speoifie performance and declaratory relief based on an oral agreement for a written lease and option to purchase certain real property in the City of Lancaster, manifested only by an incomplete and uncertain written deposit receipt. A cross-complaint and counterclaim was also filed. As appears from an excerpt of the judgment quoted below, these latter pleadings are irrelevant to a disposal of the issue here involved.
On August 2, 1965, the Secretary of State suspended the powers, rights and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Boyle v. Lakeview Creamery Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Capital National Bank v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Ransome-Crummey Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Schwartz v. Magyar House, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1959
- Vallera v. ValleraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. 2.61 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Color-Vue, Inc. v. AbramsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- United States v. 2.61 Acres Of Land, More Or Less, Situated In The County Of Mariposa, State Of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Laurel Crest, Inc. v. VaughnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- United States v. 2.61 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in the County of Mariposa, State of California Wawona Village, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985