Legal Opinion

Laurel Crest, Inc. v. Vaughn

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1969No. Civ. 1148PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.

Respondents moved to dismiss the appeal taken by Laurel Crest, Inc. in the above-entitled case on the ground of legal incapacity, because the corporate powers of said organization were suspended on the 1st day of December, 1967, pursuant to the provisions of the California Banking Corporation Tax Law now set forth in section 23302 of the Eevenue and Taxation Code. The Franchise Tax Board, on that date, transmitted to the office of the Secretary of State a list of all domestic corporations whose corporate powers, rights and privileges had been suspended under the law; one of the corporations…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Boyle v. Lakeview Creamery Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Reed v. NormanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Ransome-Crummey Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Schwartz v. Magyar House, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mather Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  2. Gar-Lo, Inc. v. Prudential Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Thunderbird Investment Corp. v. RothschildCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Urich Oil Co. v. Crown Discount Department StoresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API