Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Grigsby

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided August 26, 2010No. 20060481-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORME, Judge:

T1 Plaintiffs Ginga M. and Charlie S. Arnold appeal the trial court's summary judgment order in favor of defendant David Grigsby, M.D., which determined that, pursuant to the generally applicable tolling statute, see Utah Code Ann. § 78-12-85 (2002), 1 the statute of limitations was not tolled by Dr. Grigsby's departure from the state of Utah and that the Arnolds claims were time-barred by the two-year statute of limitations contained in the Utah Health Care Malpractice Act (the Malpractice Act), see id. § 78-14-4(1) 2 We previously reversed the trial court's order,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Gamma West Brachytherapy, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Doit, Inc. v. Touche, Ross & Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Sevy v. Security Title Co. of Southern UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  4. USA POWER, LLC v. PacifiCorpUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Arnold v. GrigsbyUtah Supreme Court · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arnold v. GrigsbyUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Arnold v. WhiteUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Roth v. JosephCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
  4. Lopez v. Ogden CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  5. Muir v. Wasatch Front Waste and RecyclingCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API