Legal Opinion
Roth v. Joseph
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided November 26, 2010No. 20090716-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VOROS, Judge:
T1 This medical malpractice case involves two questions, one involving the setting aside of a default certificate, the other the application of the limitations statute. Plaintiff Larry Roth filed a medical malpractice action against Dr. Ronald Joseph and St. Mark's Hospital (the Hospital), alleging that Dr. Joseph negligently failed to clearly identify for the surgeon a spot in Mr. Roth's colon that needed to be resected. 1 Mr. Roth filed his "notice of intent" against Dr. Joseph on May 9, 2007. The trial court determined that Mr. Roth's claim was barred by the statute of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Beitel v. OCA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Menzies v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- Foil v. BallingerUtah Supreme Court · 1979
- Daniels v. Gamma West Brachytherapy, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Jensen v. IHC Hospitals, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pierucci v. U.S. Bank, NACourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
- Gillman v. GillmanUtah Supreme Court · 2021
- Lee v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
- Wittingham, LLC v. TNE Ltd. P'shipUtah Supreme Court · 2018