Arnold v. Grigsby
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Justice Himonas, opinion of the Court:
INTRODUCTION
¶ 1 Gina Arnold went in for a routine colonoscopy and ended up with a potentially fatal condition when her bowel was perforated during the procedure. She subsequently filed a medical malpractice claim against Dr. David Grigsby. This appeal is from a medical malpractice suit where the jury concluded that Ms. Arnold's lawsuit against Dr. Grigsby was time-barred. In particular, the jury found that Ms. Arnold's cause of action against Dr. Grigsby had accrued-that she should have known of her injury and that it was caused by Dr. Grigsby's…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Orvis v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- Bailey v. BaylesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Manzanares v. ByingtonUtah Supreme Court · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Bistline v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- State v. BeverlyUtah Supreme Court · 2018
- Smith v. Volkswagen SouthtowneUtah Supreme Court · 2022
- UMIA Insurance v. SaltzUtah Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. GuerroCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.