Legal Opinion
New Mexico Industrial Energy Consumers v. New Mexico Public Regulation Commission
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided August 28, 2007No. 29,633PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SERNA, Justice.
{1} Pursuant to the Renewable Energy Act (“REA”), NMSA 1978, §§ 62-16-1 to-10 (2004, prior to 2007 amendment), El Paso Electric Company (“EPE”) purchased Renewable Energy Certificates (“RECs”) representing renewable energy generated by Public Service Company of New Mexico (“PNM”); however, EPE did not purchase the actual renewable energy represented by the RECs. Pursuant to the REA, Section 62-16-6(A), EPE sought recovery of the REC costs through its automatic adjustment clause, see NMSA 1978, § 62-8-7(E) (2003). The Public Regulation Commission (“Commission”) approved…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- State v. RowellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Morningstar Water Users Ass'n v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- National Council on Compensation Insurance v. New Mexico State Corp. CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Quintana v. SchnedarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Marbob Energy Corp. v. New Mexico Oil Conservation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- Dewitt v. Rent-A-Center, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority v. New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- Lion's Gate Water v. D'ANTONIONew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- Chatterjee v. KingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.