Legal Opinion
In Re Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board Panel No. 94-17
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 2, 1996No. C7-95-1666PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In February of 1995, the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (Director) issued appellant a private admonition pursuant to Rule 8(d)(2), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), concluding that appellant’s conduct in charging a client for time spent defending an ethics complaint brought by the client violated Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.5(a) and 8.4(d). Appellant appealed the admonition, a hearing was held before a Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board Panel (LPRB Panel), and the LPRB Panel affirmed the admonition. Appellant then appealed the LPRB…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against GettySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- In re X.Y.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Appeal of Admonition Regarding A.M.E.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- In Re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct Against MDKSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
4Cited by3 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Kenneth F. DolezalSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Robert D. STONEBURNER, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0105909Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- In Re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct Contained in Panel Case No. 15976Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002