Legal Opinion
In Re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct Against MDK
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 14, 1995No. C3-95-451PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Respondent, MDK, an attorney licensed to practice law in Minnesota, failed to include the word “Advertisement” at the beginning of a solicitation letter. At the request of the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility, the Hennepin County District Ethics Committee, investigated a complaint resulting from the letter. The Committee found MDK had violated Minn.R.Prof.Conduct 7.2(f) and recommended an admonition. The Director issued this admonition, and on appeal the Lawyers Board Panel affirmed the admonition. We affirm the Panel.
Respondent, MDK, was admitted to…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- In re X.Y.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
4Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board Panel No. 94-17Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- In Re Panel Case No. 17289Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- In re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct in Panel File No. 41755Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- Matter of Panel File 96-35Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- In Re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct Against 97-29Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.