Legal Opinion

Gaulding v. Celotex Corp.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1989No. C-7615PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GONZALEZ, Justice.

This asbestos products liability case is one of first impression in Texas. Petitioners concede that they are unable to identify the specific manufacturer of a product and therefore seek to impose collective liability against a number of possible tortfeasors. Suit was brought by the survivors of Ethel Gaulding, deceased, against Celotex Corporation, National Gypsum Company, United States Gypsum Company, Keene Corporation, and G.A.F. Corporation, five alleged manufacturers of asbestos-containing board. The petitioners claim that the board was defective and unreasonably…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Mobil Chemical Company v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Robertson v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. Firestone Steel Products Co. v. BarajasTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Pustejovsky v. Rapid-American Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Juhl v. AiringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1997

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API