Legal Opinion

Firestone Steel Products Co. v. Barajas

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1996No. 95-0382PublishedCited by 206 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, Justice

in which PHILLIPS, Chief Justice, GONZALEZ, HECHT, CORNYN, SPECTOR, OWEN, and ABBOTT, Justices, join.

This is a wrongful death ease based on allegations of negligence, strict products liability, and civil conspiracy against Firestone Steel Products Company and others. The trial court granted summary judgment for Firestone. The court of appeals reversed and remanded the cause for trial. 895 S.W.2d 789. We reverse the court of appeals’ judgment and render judgment for Firestone. We hold that in the circumstances of this case, the original designer of a general product concept that is copied,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Massey v. Armco Steel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Alm v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp. v. Nortex Oil & Gas Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Triplex Communications, Inc. v. RileyTexas Supreme Court · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by206 opinions

  1. American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. First United Pentecostal Church of Beaumont v. ParkerTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Chon Tri v. J.T.T.Texas Supreme Court · 2005

201 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API