Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 15, 1911No. Nos. 17,235—(1)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Case certified from the district court for Itamsey County, Orr, J., under It. L. 1905,, § 5409, for the determination of the questions stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

An order to show cause was duly issued in the court below, requiring defendant to appear at a time and place named to answer to a charge of contempt of court. The order was issued upon an affidavit presented to the court by the county attorney, charging defendant with an attempt to influence the action of a grand juror in respect to a matter then pending before the jury, and which involved the questions whether an indictment should be returned against one *229Hubbell on an accusation of manslaughter. On the return day defendant appeared and submitted an affidavit in explanation of the matters…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BillingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  2. State v. ByrudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
  3. City of Duluth v. OrrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Peterson v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. State v. RepsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. State v. MollerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  4. State v. BristolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  5. State ex rel. Sandquist v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API