Legal Opinion

State v. Bristol

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 3, 1967No. 40583PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

This case raises the issue of whether an order denying a pretrial motion to suppress evidence under the rule announced in State ex rel. Rasmussen v. Tahash, 272 Minn. 539, 141 N. W. (2d) 3, and certified by the trial judge as a “doubtful question” is an appealable order.

On March 2, 1966, defendant, Roger Bristol, was arrested by two agents of the State Crime Bureau pursuant to a warrant on the front steps of his home. He refused to allow the arresting officers to enter his home. Consequently, the agents, without a search warrant, smashed a quarter-panel of glass in the front…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Cogen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. State Ex Rel. Rasmussen v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  5. State v. SchifskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. ChildsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. State v. MollerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. State v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  4. State v. KvaleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. BrinkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API