Legal Opinion

City of Duluth v. Orr

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 7, 1910No. Nos. 16,437—(206)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In the municipal court of Duluth defendant’s demurrer to a complaint which charged' him with the violation of an ordinance of that city regulating the storage of explosives was overruled, Cutting, Special Judge.

Read the full summary

In the municipal court of Duluth defendant’s demurrer to a complaint which charged' him with the violation of an ordinance of that city regulating the storage of explosives was overruled, Cutting, Special Judge. Pursuant to stipulation of counsel, the questions involved were certified to the district court for St. Louis county, where the court, Ensign, Cant, Hughes and Dibell, JJ., answered the questions relating to the regulation of the storage of explosives outside the limits of the city in the affirmative. Pursuant to another stipulation of counsel the questions decided adversely to…

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Defendant was complained against in the municipal court of the city of Duluth for the violation of an ordinance of the city, and when arrested and brought before the court interposed a general de*432murrer to the complaint. With the consent of the parties, the court, acting under section 5409, ft. L. 1905, certified the questions presented by the demurrer to the district court for determination, and that court in turn certified the questions to this court.

The statute referred to authorizes the district court to certify questions of an important nature to the supreme, court in cases where a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BillingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  2. State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API