Legal Opinion

Johnston v. Miller

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1950No. Docket 45, Calendar 44,551PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.

This case involves the interpretation of a contract between plaintiff and defendant. In the fall of 1941, plaintiff inserted an advertisement in a newspaper stating in effect that he had sheep “to put out.” Following negotiations concerning the matter, the parties entered into the following written agreement, which appears as exhibit B to the reply filed in the case:

“October 17, 1941
“On this day and date I, Nelson Johnston let to E. E. Miller (64) Sixty-four sheep, on terms -(3) years to double. And to be returned in yews [ewes] (3) three years old or not more than (5) five years old. The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Prowant v. SealySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. State ex rel. Davis v. MortensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Laevin v. St. Vincent De Paul Society of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Parks v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Grady v. SchweinlerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Harrow Products, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  3. Ray Industries, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  4. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Special Service Supply Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API