Edgar v. Parsell
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Tuscola; Beach, J. Mrs. M. V. Edgar presented a claim against the estate of G. Franklin Parsell, deceased, for certain sheep and their increase. The commissioners on claims rejected the claim in part and claimant appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for defendant upon a directed verdict. Claimant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.
Mrs. M. V. Edgar inaugurated this proceeding in the probate court of Tuscola county to establish a claim against the estate of Franklin Par-sell, deceased. Josephine Parsell, executrix of said estate, contested said claim, which was for 12 ewe sheep let to deceased, with one-half their wool and increase from 1898 to 1913, amounting less credits to $307.50. The commissioners on claims rejected all of said account but $31.61, and allowed the claim for the latter amount. Claimant appealed the matter to the circuit court, where a judgment was entered in favor of said estate on a verdict directed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Blount v. BeallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Gebhard v. SattlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
- Reizenstein v. MarquardtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Smith v. NilesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1848
- Woodward v. EdmundsUtah Supreme Court · 1899
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ferry & Co. v. ForquerMontana Supreme Court · 1921
- Bibby's Refrigeration, Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. SalisburySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
- Johnston v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
- Fast Bearing Co. v. Koppers Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
- Louisville & N. R. v. Conasauga River Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.