Legal Opinion

Candeias v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 16, 1920No. Civ. No. 2244PublishedCited by 3 opinions

PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel the Superior Court of Merced County and E. N. Rector, Judge thereof, to order a stay of execution. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

BUCK, P. J., pro tem.

Mandamus to compel respondent, as judge of the superior court of the county of Merced, to order a stay of execution upon a judgment of dispossession rendered against petitioner in an uplawful detainer suit now on appeal to this court.

From the petition and return it appears that petitioner was the tenant of one Pfitzer of an eighty-acre dairy farm under a five-year lease, expiring in December of 1922. At the time of the lease there were about forty-five acres of the land planted to alfalfa, and by the terms of the lease petitioner agreed to “keep all stock off of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wood v. StrotherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Newlands v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Raisch v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Hensley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Plummer v. AgoureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Charles L. Donohoe Co. v. Superior Court of GlennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Mehr v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. California Cotton Credit Corporation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API