Legal Opinion
First Federal Lincoln Bank v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 28, 2004No. 95-518CPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARGOLIS, Senior Judge.
First Federal Lincoln Bank v. United States, 58 Fed. Cl. 363 (2003) (“First Federal IF’), resolved the issue whether the government and First Federal Lincoln Bank (“Lincoln” or “plaintiff’) had entered into binding contracts with respect to Lincoln’s mergers with three failing savings and loan associations or thrifts. Id. at 364. The Court found that a contract existed between Lincoln and the government with respect to Lincoln’s merger with Great Plains Federal Savings and Loan Association of Falls City, Nebraska (“Great Plains”), id. at 369, but that no…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- California Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- D & N Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Bishop v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Griswold v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Shirlington Limousine & Transportation, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Four Rivers Investments, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- American Federal Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Southern Nuclear Operating Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.