Legal Opinion

United States Telesis Incorporated v. Ende

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 16, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2013-0015PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, District Judge.

Plaintiff United States Telesis, Inc. (“UST”) seeks damages for alleged legal mal practice, negligence and breach of fiduciary duty by Neil S. Ende and his law firm Technology Law Group LLC (“TLG”) arising out of TLG’s representation of UST in a 2005 civil case. UST alleges that TLG failed to take reasonable steps to avoid reasonably foreseeable risks in the underlying case, that TLG was negligent in representing UST, and that TLG breached its fiduciary duties owed to UST, including TLG’s duty to act in good faith and in UST’s best interest.

U…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance v. BenderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Folliard v. Comstor Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. Aghakasiri v. GarlandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
  3. Cherokee Nation v. United States Department of InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
  4. Folliard v. Comstor CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API