Legal Opinion

Rojas-Espinoza v. Bondi

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 25, 2025No. 24-7536Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARICRUZ MARISOL ROJAS- No. 24-7536 ESPINOZA; ROBERT SALVADOR- GOMEZ; DAVID SALVADOR- Agency Nos. ROJAS; KORINA SALVADOR- A246-606-483 ROJAS, A246-606-482 A246-606-484 Petitioners, A246-606-485 v. ORDER PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, AMENDING ORDER Respondent. DENYING STAY OF REMOVAL Filed October 24, 2025 Amended November 25, 2025 2 ROJAS-ESPINOZA V. BONDI ORDER The order filed on October 24, 2025 is amended by (1) inserting, in a new line above “PER CURIAM” at the beginning of the order, the following: “Before: Ryan D.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Raul Barajas-Romero v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. Deqa Ahmad Haji Ali Madaar A. Osman Isack A. Osman v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Victoria Kaye Johnson, A/K/A Victoria Kaye SouthernCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API