Legal Opinion
Deqa Ahmad Haji Ali Madaar A. Osman Isack A. Osman v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 19, 2005No. 03-71731PublishedCited by 108 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judge.
Deqa Ahmad Haji Ali petitions on behalf of herself and her two sons, Madaar Osman and Isack Osman, for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of their requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 1 Ali, Madaar, and Isack are all natives of Somalia. The Immigration Judge (“IJ”) dismissed Ali’s asylum claim based on findings that: (1) she had failed to establish that her past persecution was on account of an enumerated ground; and (2) that Ali and her sons had firmly resettled in Ethiopia…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. StevicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mohamed Abdille v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by108 opinions
- Ukashu Nuru, AKA Ukasha Nuru v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Galina Ivanovna Smolniakova v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Ramon Antonio Delgado v. U.S. Atty. Gen.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Jose Patricio Boer-Sedano v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.