Legal Opinion
Rood v. Umatilla County
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided November 20, 2007No. 3:06-cr-00346PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BROWN, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan issued Findings and Recommendation (# 46) on September 4, 2007, in which she recommended the Court grant in part and deny in part Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (#27) and Defendants’ Motion to Strike (# 38). Defendants filed timely Objections to the Findings and Recommendation only as to the recommendation that the Court grant in part and deny in part Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
When any party…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Garcetti v. CeballosSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. Commodore Business MacHines Inc. And Commodore Business MacHines (Canada) LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Morgan v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Gloeckner v. Kraft Heinz Foods Company LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021
- Granas v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
- Granas v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- McNae v. ARAG Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.