Legal Opinion

Granas v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided September 21, 2023No. 1:21-cv-00116Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION MARK GRANAS, Civ. No. 1:21-cv-00116-AA Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant. _______________________________________ AIKEN, District Judge: Plaintiff is a former train conductor for defendant Union Pacific Railroad. Plaintiff claims that defendant violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12112. Before the Court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 30. For the reasons explained BACKGROUND I. Plaintiff’s Job Responsibilities at Union…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Albertson's, Inc. v. KirkingburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Bates v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API