Curtis H. Springer v. May Best
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents an incredible and almost impossible “record” for a reviewing court. Appellant Springer, though constantly urged to employ legal counsel, appears in propria persona. Appellee May Best, though repeatedly urged to employ legal counsel, appears in propria persona. Appellee Albright appears by attorneys Herzig and Hill, as do the three appellee minors, Lolly, Dolly and Tommy Best. One of the attorneys, Max L. Herzig states, seeking to appear as amicus curiae, “that he is a physician by profession.” 1 We commented in our per curiam opinion affirming the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Middleton v. Hartford Acc. & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- Schuyler v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
- Morris v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- United States v. BradenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alonzo Bonner, Cross-Appellant v. Joseph Coughlin, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Leslie C. Bostick and Charles P. Lainhart v. United States of America, Leslie C. Bostick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Carrigan v. California State LegislatureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Carrigan v. California State LegislatureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Adam Emmanuel Garcia v. City of Newport BeachDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.