Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Radcliffe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 27, 1954No. 13726_1Published
1Opinion of the Court
211 F.2d 309
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
v.
RADCLIFFE et al.
No. 13726.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
March 3, 1954.
As Modified on Denial of Rehearing
April 27, 1954.
George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, H. T. Herrick, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Eli A. Weston, J. L. Eberle, Boise, Idaho, for respondents.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Dyer v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- National Labor Relations Board v. Condenser Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- National Labor Relations Board v. A. S. Abell Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.