Legal Opinion

Schick v. Riemer

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 15, 1953No. 28646PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOUSER, Commissioner.

This is a suit by Harry Schick and Walter Ennis, minority stockholders, against Francis Riemer, the majority''stockholder, Carl J. Stay and-F. Lee Riemer, stockholders, and against the corporation itself, in which pláintiffs seek judgment on the theory that a single,, dominant, majority and controlling stockholder has no legal right to vote to- pay himself and his subservient nominee assets out of the corporate treasury without the knowledge and approval of, ratification by, or discussion with substantial minority stockholders. The trial court entered a decree for…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Porter v. SabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Caldwell v. EubanksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  3. Heuer v. John R. Thompson Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Merrill v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  5. Punch v. Hipolite Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gieselmann v. StegemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  2. Saigh Ex Rel. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. BuschMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Dawson v. DawsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. In Re Bridge Information Systems, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri · 2005
  5. Peterson v. KennedyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API