Legal Opinion
City of Nashville, Tennessee v. United States
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided May 24, 1957No. Civ. 2354PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
The undersigned three-judge court was assembled pursuant to sections 2284 and 2321-2325, Title 28, United States Code, for the hearing of an application for interlocutory injunction. The court has considered the pleadings and the proceedings and evidence adduced before the Interstate Commerce Commission, the entire record in the case, and the oral arguments and briefs of the attorneys for the plaintiff, for the defendants, and for all the intervenors, constituting all the parties. It was agreed that the hearing would be a final hearing on the merits upon demand for a permanent injunction.
The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Georgia v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- James C. Batts v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company, Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company v. Austin P. CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- Stott v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- United States v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1969
- Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1960
- United States v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.