Legal Opinion

Malott v. Goff

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1884No. 11,261PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

In this case the only error assigned by the appellant, Malott, the plaintiff below, is the decision of the circuit court in sustaining appellee’s demurrer to his complaint.

The material facts stated by the appellant in his complaint are as follows: On the 18th day of February, 1878, one Jesse H. Nelson and his wife conveyed by their deed of that date lot No. 4, in block No. 18, in the town of Marion, in Grant county, to Millicent Malott, then and since the wife of the appellant. On the same day, and in consideration of such conveyance, the appellant and his wife conveyed 58.66 acres of land,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. . WimanNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
  2. Devol v. McIntoshIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Durham v. CraigIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Gunel v. CueIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Bodkin v. MeritIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First State Bank of Paradise v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Helms v. AppletonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Reynolds v. ShirkIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Goff v. HedgecockIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API