Legal Opinion

Gunel v. Cue

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1880No. 7402PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From the Howard Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

— In this case the only question for the decision of this court is this : Does the appellee’s complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action?

In his complaint the appellee alleged, in substance, that the appellants executed to said John Floyd, in his lifetime, a mortgage on certain real estate in Howard county, a copy *35of which mortgage was filed with and made part of the complaint ; that the mortgage was given to Save and secure the said John Floyd from loss or expense by reason of his having signed a certain note, described in the mortgage; that the said note was sued upon,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. . WimanNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
  2. Devol v. McIntoshIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Wright v. WhitingNew York Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Sloan v. WittbankIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Weddle v. StoneIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Catterlin v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Main v. GinthertIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Durham v. CraigIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Bodkin v. MeritIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. McFadden v. HopkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API