Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Stasko

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 3, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 23, 1998, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

Claimant’s former employment ended under nondisqualifying circumstances and, the week before he filed an original claim for unemployment benefits, he and two other individuals incorporated a computer consulting and resale business of which claimant was president and a one-third shareholder. Claimant invested $7,000 to start the business, used his home address as the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of FalcoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of JohnstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re the Claim of MurakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. In re the Claim of Le PoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. In re the Claim of BreitroseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of AlmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API