Legal Opinion

Donahue v. Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 27, 1961No. 19500PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

In the interest of brevity we will refer to plaintiff in error as protestant; to the Public Utilities Commission of Colorado as the commission; and to Pikes Peak Automobile Company as the applicant. The controversy involves the rights claimed by the protestant to serve as a common carrier in providing transportation to and from the airport at Colorado Springs, without interference from the applicant.

For a full understanding of the history of this controversy, and some of the facts which are pertinent to the matters which now command our attention, we refer to our opinion in Public Utilities…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McKay v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
  2. D. F. Bast, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Public Utilities Commission v. DonahueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  4. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  5. Rowley v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Miller Bros., Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  2. Ephraim Freightways, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  3. McKenna v. NigroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  4. People ex rel. J.C.S.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Western Colorado Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API