Legal Opinion
McKenna v. Nigro
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided June 25, 1962No. 20027PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Pringle.
Plaintiffs in error were plaintiffs in the trial court and will be referred to as such or by name. Defendant in error, Public Utilities Commission, will be referred to as the Commission.
Plaintiffs filed an application with the Commission seeking clarification of the scope of Certificate of Convenience and Necessity No. 692 of which they were the owners. Specifically, they sought to have the certificate construed so as to authorize them to operate as a common carrier of freight from Denver to Greeley. The Commission determined that the certificate in question did…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. Red Arrow Freight Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Malone Freight Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1952
- McKay v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
- Pennsylvania Rd. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- Donahue v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Union Rural Electric Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Miller Bros., Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
- Aspen Airways, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
- Public Service Co. of Colorado v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Public Utilities Commission v. Grand Valley Rural Power Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.