Legal Opinion
Bruno v. Hanna
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 17, 1960PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
63 N.J. Super. 282 (1960)
164 A.2d 647
EMERIC BRUNO, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
JOHN HANNA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 27, 1960.
Decided October 17, 1960.
Before Judges PRICE, GAULKIN and SULLIVAN.
Mr. Frank Romano argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents.
Mr. Joseph Feinman argued the cause for defendants-appellants.
The opinion of the court was delivered by SULLIVAN, J.A.D.
This appeal involves the construction of certain restrictive covenants of record insofar as they affect ten lots of vacant land in Ridgefield, New…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bear v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Fortesque v. CarrollSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
- Hammett v. RosensohnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Brigham v. H. G. Mulock Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908
- Underwood v. Herman & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Caullett v. Stanley Stilwell & Sons, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Stephenson v. PerlitzTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- Cooper River Plaza East, LLC v. Briad GroupNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Trenkamp v. Township of BurlingtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- Acme Markets, Inc. v. Wharton Hardware & Supply Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.