Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Deliere

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 28, 1976No. 175PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that he is entitled to be compensated for the termination of an implied easement.

In 1947, appellee purchased the lot in Cecil Township, Washington County, on which appellants now reside. In 1949, appellee constructed a concrete driveway along the northeastern boundary of her property. Unbeknownst to appellee, her driveway encroached upon her neighbor’s land to the northeast, and, thereby, appropriated a triangular strip of ground measuring 18 inches at the base (formed by the junction of the driveway and the roadway, State Route 50) and approximately 5 feet…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Becker v. RittenhouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Schwoyer v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. DePIETRO v. TRIANOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Spaeder v. TabakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Witman v. StichterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Daddona v. ThorpeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Possessky v. DiemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Brace v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  4. Mann-Hoff v. BoyerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Tomlinson v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API