Legal Opinion

Mann-Hoff v. Boyer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 1992No. 03462PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

This is an appeal from a final decree in equity recognizing that plaintiffs-appellees, G.C.G. Mann-Hoff and Gerald Hofmann, have an easement of access to certain parking spaces on the residential property of defendants-appellants, Eric and Susan Boyer, and enjoining appellants from interfering with that easement. The trial court found that the easement arose by implication. We reverse on the ground that the standard for finding an easement by implication was clearly not met in this case.

The facts as revealed by our careful review of this record are as follows. Appellees…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Van Products Co. v. General Welding & Fabricating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Burns Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. BoehmSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Becker v. RittenhouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Keefer v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Tosh v. WittsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Louis W. Epstein Family Partnership Levitz Furniture Corporation, Intervenor in D.C. v. Kmart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. Phillippi v. KnotterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Daddona v. ThorpeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Possessky v. DiemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Kimmel v. Lower Paxton TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API