Legal Opinion

Graham v. Gunter

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 26, 1993No. 92SA379PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

Harold Graham, appearing pro se, appeals from an order of the Lincoln County District Court dismissing his petition for habeas corpus relief. The district court dismissed Graham’s petition because the issues raised in the habeas petition should have been raised on appeal. We reverse and remand with directions to convert Graham’s habeas petition to a Crim.P. 35(c) motion and transfer venue to the sentencing court in Jefferson County for resolution of the issues that could be properly raised in a Crim.P. 35(c) motion.

I

Graham was charged with sexual assault on a child, pursuant to § 18-3-405, 8B…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. WiedemerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. White v. Denver District Court, Division 12Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  3. Kodama v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  4. People v. FagerholmSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  5. Kailey v. Colorado State Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Horton v. SuthersSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. Duran v. PriceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. People v. FlaggColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Dallas Creek Water Co. v. HueySupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. Graham v. ZavarasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API