Legal Opinion
People v. Flagg
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided July 6, 2000No. 99CA0231PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge NIETO.
Defendant, Edwin L. Flagg, Jr., appeals the order denying his pro se motion entitled "Verified Petition for Remedial Writ in the Nature of Habeas Corpus." We affirm.
The parties have treated defendant's motion as one for post-conviction relief. Therefore, we review the merits of the defendant's claims under Crim. P. 35(c). See Graham v. Gunter, 855 P.2d 1384 (Colo.1998) (recogniz ing that in some cireumstances a court may convert a habeas petition into a Crim. P. 35(c) motion when a pro se petitioner has asserted claims in a petition for habeas corpus which should have…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- United States v. J. Clenton Henson (87-5132) Sheila Henson Lutz (87-5138) & C. Alan Henson (87-5144)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Craig v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- State v. BootsOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Gasper v. GunterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hamon Contractors, Inc. v. Carter & Burgess, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- Juhl v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Larrieu v. Best Buy Stores, L.P.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2013
- People v. ZunigaColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- People v. VenzorColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.