Legal Opinion
People v. Fagerholm
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided February 27, 1989No. 86SA455PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KIRSHBAUM, Justice.
The defendant, Gary Fagerholm, entered a guilty plea to the offense of attempted sexual assault on a child, in violation of sections 18-2-101 and 18-3-405, 8B C.R.S. (1986), in the El Paso County District Court. Upon denial of his application for probation because of two prior felony convictions, Fagerholm filed a motion pursuant to Crim.P. 35(c) challenging the constitutionality of one of these convictions. The People argued that Fagerholm was precluded from attacking his earlier convictions by the terms of section 16-5-402, 8A C.R.S. (1986), and by the equitable doctrine…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Robert Lawrence Co. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Continental Title Co. v. District Court in & for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- People v. GermanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- French v. DeaneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- People v. WiedemerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Ficarra v. Department of Regulatory Agencies, Division of InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Bret S. Klein v. Donice Neal Gale Norton, Attorney General of the State of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- People v. HamptonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Lobato v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.