Crested Butte South Metropolitan District v. Hoffman
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Vollack
Two landowners, Frank S. Hoffman and Robert A. Caliendo (landowners), appeal1 the district court’s ruling that the Crested Butte South Metropolitan District (District) properly assessed “availability of service or facilities” charges (ASF fees) against them, and the court’s award of attorney fees in favor of the District. We affirm.
I
This appeal concerns a dispute between the landowners and the District over the validity of certain fees the District assessed against the landowners’ properties for water and sewer services that were available, but not connected, to the properties.2 The parties…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Orr v. OrrSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Heninger v. CharnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- City of Colorado Springs v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
- Torres v. PortillosSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sears v. RomerColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- Cerveny v. City of Wheat RidgeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Durango West Metropolitan District 1 v. HKS Joint Venture PartnershipColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Rodgers v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- Sears v. RomerColorado Court of Appeals · 1996