Legal Opinion

Torres v. Portillos

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 14, 1981No. 81 SC 136PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUBOFSKY, Justice.

We granted certiorari to review a ruling by the district court of the Tenth Judicial District that the provision of section 38-12-103(3)(a) mandating an award of attorneys’ fees and court costs to a tenant is unconstitutional because it denies a landlord equal protection of the laws and equal access to the courts. We determine that the statutory provision is constitutional and reverse the judgment of the district court.

Martin Torres (tenant) brought an action in the county court under section 38-12-103(3)(a), C.R.S.1973, 1 to recover a $100.00 security deposit withheld by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Ortwein v. SchwabSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Ortwein v. SchwabSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Heninger v. CharnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kinsey v. PreesonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. State Ex Rel. Colorado State Claims Board of the Division of Risk Management v. DeFoorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. Charlton v. KimataSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. Colorado Society of Community & Institutional Psychologists, Inc. v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  5. Mau v. E.P.H. Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API