Legal Opinion
Cerveny v. City of Wheat Ridge
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided February 13, 1995No. 93CA1453PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge HUME.
Plaintiffs, Carl Cerveny, George J. Lang-don, and Kenneth K. Siler, and third-party appellants, Kevin B. Pratt and Douglas Bruce, appeal the trial court’s order denying an award of costs and attorney fees after plaintiffs prevailed on their claim against defendant, City of Wheat Ridge, for injunctive and declaratory relief under Colo. Const, art. X, § 20 (the amendment). We reverse and remand with directions.
Plaintiffs sued to prevent defendant from holding a special election on a ballot issue. After plaintiffs prevailed, they sought an award of attorney fees and costs as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Marino v. OrtizSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Urbish v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Tower v. TowerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
- Miller v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
- American Respiratory Care Services v. Manager of RevenueColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Wheat Ridge v. CervenySupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Board of County Commissioners v. Dougherty, Dawkins, Strand & Bigelow Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Bush v. WinkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Bush v. WinkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- City of Wheat Ridge v. CervenySupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.