William M. Freeman v. Richard A. Mayer and Spangler, Jennings & Dougherty, P.C.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge.
Fee-sharing arrangements between lawyers are regulated in Indiana under Rule 1.5(e) of the Rules of Professional Conduct promulgated by the Indiana Supreme Court. In this case, we must decide whether such a fee-sharing agreement existed between William M. Freeman, at the relevant time an Illinois lawyer, and Richard A. Mayer, an Indiana lawyer and his law firm, Spangler, Jennings & Dougherty, P.C. (For convenience, we refer to both as Mayer, unless the context requires otherwise.) Because we conclude, like the district court, that a contract arose between Freeman…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Rosi v. Business Furniture Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Colleen Baer v. First Options of Chicago, Incorporated, Appeal of Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland, P.C. v. James R. AntonionoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Suyemasa v. MyersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Jay Clutter Custom Digging v. EnglishIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Post v. BregmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Walker v. GribbleSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Estate of Moreland v. DieterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Piaskoski & Associates v. RicciardiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- In Re Fpi/agretech Securities Litigation. Thomas W. Hayes, Agretech Trustee v. Karl Haushalter Ernest & Young, Lieff, Cabraser & Heimann, Applicant-Appellee v. Jamie Chuck Chuck, Jones & MacLaren Applicants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.