Legal Opinion

Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Coosa Land Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 17, 1935No. 7 Div. 328PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, Justice.

Bill by complainant, Coosa Land Company, to define and establish an uncertain and disputed boundary line between the lands of the complainant and the respondent, the Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Company.

It is conceded, we conclude from appellant’s brief, that the bill as amended contains all necessary jurisdictional averments, but objection is taken by demurrer that the bill as amended is defective, in that it does not attempt to describe the true boundary line between the lands of complainant and respondent, nor does it aver that this line was unknown.

Objection is also made…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Smith v. BachusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Hopkins v. DuggarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  4. Clarke v. EarnestSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Alverson v. FloydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Blalock v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  2. Wise v. MasseeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  3. Finerson v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Milstead v. DevineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  5. Cox v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API