Legal Opinion

In re Weeks

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 22, 1931No. 2636PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGaRREtt, Judge

Appellant has here appealed from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office sustaining the action of the examiner in rejecting his 11 claims numbered 20 to 30, inclusive, for “new and useful improvements in portable hoisting apparatus.”

Appellant’s claimed invention relates primarily to stevedoring, that is, to the unloading of ships, particularly ocean-going vessels.

Claim Uo. 26 is for the method; the remainder are directed to the article.

From appellant’s brief we quote the following:

Claims 20 to 23, 27, 29, and 30 are descriptions of the variants of structure-which basically…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. BeachSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. National Cash Register Co. v. Boston Cash Indicator & Recorder Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Comptograph Co. v. Mechanical Accountant Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1906
  4. Cutler-Hammer Mfg. Co. v. Union Electric Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re McCurdyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
  2. In Re WadmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API