Legal Opinion
In re McKee
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided November 25, 1935No. Patent Appeal No. 3534PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLAND, Associate Judge.
The invention involved in this appeal which is from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming the Primary Examiner’s rejection of certain claims, relates to a method of ink marking, underneath the covering or fell, of carcasses, particularly sheep carcasses.
Appellant has been granted two apparatus claims in patent No. 1,936,170, issued November 21, 1933. Separate application was filed in which claims for a method of marking carcasses were presented.
The examiner rejected all the claims upon references, and rejected claims 2 and 3,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Expanded Metal Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Dolbear v. American Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- In Re CadyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
- In Re ErnstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
- In Re CarltonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Helen Russell Pierce, of the Last Will and Testament of George Washington Pierce, Deceased v. Allen B. Du Mont Laboratories, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- Application of Samuel E. WinderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Application of Samuel E. WinderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- In re WinderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957