Legal Opinion

Benson v. Rosler

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1985No. 84-1677Published

1DissentCelebrezze, C.J.

In my opinion the majority’s version of the events which transpired does not reflect the true facts of the case and borders on fantasy. Because I cannot agree to such an unsupportable posture, I dissent.

In the present case, the record contains a list of interrogatories from the Bensons’ counsel to the insurance company. In answer to question 4(a), Farmers admits both policies were issued May 6, 1980. Question 12 asks: “If the policies were renewed, were any changes or modifications of the original policies included in the renewal?” Answer: “None.” Question No. 14: “Were any negotiations had…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Skivolocki v. East Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. MarshOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Grange Mutual Casualty Co. v. VolkmannOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Courtright v. ScrimgerOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Nichols v. PoulsonOhio Supreme Court · 1834

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API