Benson v. Rosler
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentCelebrezze, C.J.
In my opinion the majority’s version of the events which transpired does not reflect the true facts of the case and borders on fantasy. Because I cannot agree to such an unsupportable posture, I dissent.
In the present case, the record contains a list of interrogatories from the Bensons’ counsel to the insurance company. In answer to question 4(a), Farmers admits both policies were issued May 6, 1980. Question 12 asks: “If the policies were renewed, were any changes or modifications of the original policies included in the renewal?” Answer: “None.” Question No. 14: “Were any negotiations had…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Skivolocki v. East Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1974
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. MarshOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Grange Mutual Casualty Co. v. VolkmannOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Courtright v. ScrimgerOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Nichols v. PoulsonOhio Supreme Court · 1834