Legal Opinion

Benton v. Benton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 25, 1926No. 7 Div. 594PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

Appellant’s most important contentions are: 1. That the amendment to the bill of complaint was improperly allowed (1) because it was offered after a final decree settling the main issue in.the case, and (2) it changed the nature of the cause, setting up a new and different case, and working injustice to respondent. 2. That, even if allowable, it was necessary that the submission should have been first set aside, and notice of its allowance given to respondent so that he might plead, answer, or demur to the bill in its changed aspect. That,, in any event, the facts set up in the original bill,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pitts v. PowledgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  2. Rapier v. Gulf City Paper Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  3. Ex parte DelpeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  4. Tutwiler v. TutwilerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ex Parte AppersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Morgan-Hill Paving Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Wakefield v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Paulsen v. PaulsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  5. Cassady v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API