Legal Opinion

Morgan-Hill Paving Co. v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 26, 1931No. 6 Div. 500PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The verdict for defendant was finally on count 4. The issue was joined on a plea in short by consent, which included special defense, that there was no duty resting upon defendant to maintain, signal, etc., at the point in question, and that of contributory negligence of plaintiff.

The complaint contained, among other things, the material averments of fact, viz.:

“ * * * The defendant was engaged in the construction, paving or building of that certain public road in the County of Chilton, Alabama, commonly known as the Birmingham-Montgomery Highway, and * * * said automobile ran into, upon or…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  3. Morgan Hill Paving Co. v. FonvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Wear v. WearSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Western Steel Car & Foundry Co. v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. Crocker v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  4. Dollar v. McKinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  5. Southern Ry. Co. v. SherrillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API