Wilson v. California Central Railroad
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County granting a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
Action to recover from defendant the value of certain household furniture which, it is alleged, the defendant, as a common carrier by railroad, in consideration of a certain sum paid it by plaintiff as freightage, pro rata itineris, agreed safely to carry from Indianapolis, Indiana, to Los Angeles, California, and to deliver to the plaintiff or order at the latter place, but failed and refused to do so according to said agreement, whereby said furniture was wholly lost to plaintiff, to her damage in the sum of four thousand dollars,,
The answer of the defendant, for want of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Piercy v. SabinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Mulford v. EstudilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Bryan v. MaumeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Kohler v. Wells, Fargo & Co.California Supreme Court · 1864
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Morrow v. New Moon Homes, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
- George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- State v. MessinoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- Dieterle v. BekinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- B. & W. Engineering Co. v. BeamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.