Legal Opinion
Junction 615, Inc. v. Ohio Liquor Control Commission
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 30, 1999No. Nos. 98-L-121 and 98-L-123PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nader, Judge.
Appellant, Junction 615, Inc., appeals the Lake County Court of Common Pleas judgment denying its administrative appeal from the ruling of appellee, Ohio Liquor Control Commission (“the commission”).
Junction 615, according to appellant’s brief, “is similar to many of the upscale gentlemen’s clubs that are becoming so popular today. It employs dancers who perform sophisticated dance routines for the patrons.” On two occasions, the commission sent agents to Junction 615 to determine whether the “sophisticated dance routines” were in violation of former Ohio Adm.Code 4301:1-1-52…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Chicago v. Pooh Bah Enterprises, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2007
- Empress Adult Video & Bookstore v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- State v. CornwellOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. Adams, Unpublished Decision (6-14-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- HDV Cleveland, L.L.C. v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.