Legal Opinion
State v. Cornwell
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 23, 2002No. Case No. 00-C.A.-223PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Waite, Judge.
{¶ 1} This timely appeal arises from the conviction of Sean Cornwell, appellant, in Youngstown Municipal Court for violating a loud-music ordinance. Appellant argues on appeal that the ordinance is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad and violates the First Amendment. For the following reasons, we overrule appellant’s assignment of error and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
{.¶ 2} On June 2, 2000, appellant was cited for a violation of former Youngstown Municipal Ordinance (“Ord.”) 539.07(b)(1). This ordinance has since been substantially amended, but at the time…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ParenteCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- State v. McDowellOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
- City of Cleveland v. WattsCity of Cleveland Municipal Court · 2011
- City of Columbus v. KendallOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- City of Toledo v. Thompson-BeanOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.